Pipe Atelier Yashtylov - Handmade Pipes from Russia
огорчаюсь means something like "it annoys me" or "it bugs me". No online translator finds it only if you cut it to огорча
Unfortunately I don't speak Russian but many of my collegues do
Unfortunately I don't speak Russian but many of my collegues do
Got thoughts? http://grandiflorum.net
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:19 am
- Contact:
Small lesson of Russian:)tritrek wrote:огорчаюсь means something like "it annoys me" or "it bugs me". No online translator finds it only if you cut it to огорча
Unfortunately I don't speak Russian but many of my collegues do
огорчаюсь - I am upset, I suffer
Strange, my translator does not want to translate this word.... Therefore I used synonyms of this word
Good day to you,
Maybe we can start a dialogue that can be answered in "yes" or "no".
For example, when you drilled the air hole in the calabash, did you use a straight drill bit? If "no" did you use a special bit that we are not familiar with? Did you drill the hole with a power tool or by hand?
Maybe some of the other masters can help with this procedure.
Great work!!
Maybe we can start a dialogue that can be answered in "yes" or "no".
For example, when you drilled the air hole in the calabash, did you use a straight drill bit? If "no" did you use a special bit that we are not familiar with? Did you drill the hole with a power tool or by hand?
Maybe some of the other masters can help with this procedure.
Great work!!
All the best,
Tano
Tano
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:19 am
- Contact:
In a pumpkin I have cleared the air chamber in a management(manual) by means of training the big diameter and dremel and also knifes and a scalpel:) under various cornersTano wrote:Good day to you,
Maybe we can start a dialogue that can be answered in "yes" or "no".
For example, when you drilled the air hole in the calabash, did you use a straight drill bit? If "no" did you use a special bit that we are not familiar with? Did you drill the hole with a power tool or by hand?
Maybe some of the other masters can help with this procedure.
Great work!!
The aperture in direct чубуке. Under very sharp corner.
Has overlooked... - the Scalpel should be bent
- ToddJohnson
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN
- Contact:
I'm not sure how Mr. Yashtylov does this exactly, but a "pumpkin" aka gourd-Calabash is typically done this way: The tobacco chamber is drilled to a standard size--say +/- 3/4". The draft hole is then drilled as deep as possible with a standard straight bit. At this point, the two will not intersect. Then, by whatever means one feels most comfortable--rotary burs, small gouges, etc.--the tobacco chamber is hollowed out and brought to a tapered/funneled point. The funnel, however, follows the lines of the bowl, inching back toward the draft hole. Eventually, the two intersect. At that point, the bowl is more thoroughly hollowed out and smoothed to act as an expansion chamber which will accept the turned "bowl." The turned bowl sits inside the expansion chamber and there is basically a hollow chasm underneath it. The bowl is removable and held snugly in place via a compression fit using a small ring of cork or rubber around the turned bowl. This is an extremely advanced endeavor and requires a great deal of precision and control. Not for the faint of heart to be sure.PipeAtelierYashtylov wrote:In a pumpkin I have cleared the air chamber in a management(manual) by means of training the big diameter and dremel and also knifes and a scalpel:) under various cornersTano wrote:Good day to you,
Maybe we can start a dialogue that can be answered in "yes" or "no".
For example, when you drilled the air hole in the calabash, did you use a straight drill bit? If "no" did you use a special bit that we are not familiar with? Did you drill the hole with a power tool or by hand?
Maybe some of the other masters can help with this procedure.
Great work!!
The aperture in direct чубуке. Under very sharp corner.
Has overlooked... - the Scalpel should be bent
Todd
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:19 am
- Contact:
Now I know! That is simply amazing! When I see it on that picture, the principle looks pretty simple, however making must be truly hard.
Got thoughts? http://grandiflorum.net
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:19 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:19 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:03 pm
- Location: pennsylvania USA
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:19 am
- Contact:
pennsyscot wrote:Mr. Yashtylov, I think you are a very talented pipemaker. This pipe is beautiful. Could you please describe the products and process used to achieve this finish. thank you, Scot
Forgive, I have not understood your question.... My electronic translator does not consult. Try to paraphrase a question
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:19 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:03 pm
- Location: pennsylvania USA
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:19 am
- Contact:
- KurtHuhn
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5326
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: United States/Rhode Island
This looks for all the world like a staining technique similar to Tom Eltang's "Golden Contrast". It's not a method that's likely to make it into general knowledge any time soon. Only a handful of folks know and understand the procedure, and I don't think any of them are going to let the cat out of the bag.
That being said, you can get a very similar effect by following the same method I've described - which for all I know is a public domain method:
- sand at 220
- stain with a dark brown
- sand at 320
- stain with a dark brown
- sand at 400
- stain with a dark brown
- stain at 600
- topstain
- polish and buff
There's more to it than that, but you'll need to experiment to figure it out. It's not complicated, but it is a lot of repetitive work.
That being said, you can get a very similar effect by following the same method I've described - which for all I know is a public domain method:
- sand at 220
- stain with a dark brown
- sand at 320
- stain with a dark brown
- sand at 400
- stain with a dark brown
- stain at 600
- topstain
- polish and buff
There's more to it than that, but you'll need to experiment to figure it out. It's not complicated, but it is a lot of repetitive work.
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:19 am
- Contact:
Your example has liked me, on his(its) basis, I прпиведу the example. Also I shall open the secret, only tell to nobody:)
My method
To process up to 800
Painting black - long
It is good to wipe a damp cloth
Again painting black - long
Again to wipe a damp cloth
Painting red - brown - long
Again to wipe a damp cloth
To give well to dry
To process 1000
To wipe a little a damp cloth (for clearing of a color dust)
Result - it is black white fibres
Further
Drawing of a light paint (a shade on your discretion)
It is easy to process 1500
It is easy to wipe a damp cloth
To put a light shade
It is easy to process 2000
To wipe a dry cloth
It is a little to polish, and to put wax
All.
(the Main thing, the left hand in which you hold a pipe at processing should be in a glove) the hand should not sing and humidify a color dust on a pipe
My method
To process up to 800
Painting black - long
It is good to wipe a damp cloth
Again painting black - long
Again to wipe a damp cloth
Painting red - brown - long
Again to wipe a damp cloth
To give well to dry
To process 1000
To wipe a little a damp cloth (for clearing of a color dust)
Result - it is black white fibres
Further
Drawing of a light paint (a shade on your discretion)
It is easy to process 1500
It is easy to wipe a damp cloth
To put a light shade
It is easy to process 2000
To wipe a dry cloth
It is a little to polish, and to put wax
All.
(the Main thing, the left hand in which you hold a pipe at processing should be in a glove) the hand should not sing and humidify a color dust on a pipe