![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
I think this one also has sinned and fallen short of the shape of a Canadian.
Heres the first;
![Image](http://i1104.photobucket.com/albums/h336/axfight/rick004.jpg)
And the Latest.
![Image](http://i1104.photobucket.com/albums/h336/axfight/canadian003_zpsa5448d3e.jpg)
![Image](http://i1104.photobucket.com/albums/h336/axfight/canadian001_zps0d43e8bd.jpg)
![Image](http://i1104.photobucket.com/albums/h336/axfight/canadian011_zps45aab852.jpg)
The extension is Ziricote.
RadDavis wrote:I agree with Bob Gilbert.![]()
Rad
staffwalker wrote:RadDavis wrote:I agree with Bob Gilbert.![]()
Rad
Now that produces pure terror in all who read it.
Thanks Bob those are valid points, and I hadn't really looked at it from that perspective.staffwalker wrote:A Canadian by definition means a long briar shank and a short stem with at most, a very narrow, 1/4" or less ring. If you have to put an extension on the briar, IMHO, you have not made a Canadian but rather a billiard whose ratios are all wrong. bob gilbert