Bulldog/Rhodesian grooves
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 3:09 pm
OK, I've seen thread discussing this before about how to cut them, but I want to ask a slightly different question.
Is there an "appropriate" or acceptable depth and width of the ring grooves on a bulldog/Rhodesian? Obviously it could be ridiculous at a certain point being too far away or too thick relative to the diameter of the pipe bowl. But is it more a ballpark number?
Are we talking width of 1mm or 1/32" or .05" or...? On a big pipe is 1/8" too big? (Seems like it would unless the pipe was huge.)
What about depth then? Shallower is better relative to the width? I've seen many different takes on this: Petersons seem to be on the shallower side, Tsuges are deeper. Everything in between really, so I feel like it could be pretty relaxed on the carver's part. How do you judge this?
Is there an "appropriate" or acceptable depth and width of the ring grooves on a bulldog/Rhodesian? Obviously it could be ridiculous at a certain point being too far away or too thick relative to the diameter of the pipe bowl. But is it more a ballpark number?
Are we talking width of 1mm or 1/32" or .05" or...? On a big pipe is 1/8" too big? (Seems like it would unless the pipe was huge.)
What about depth then? Shallower is better relative to the width? I've seen many different takes on this: Petersons seem to be on the shallower side, Tsuges are deeper. Everything in between really, so I feel like it could be pretty relaxed on the carver's part. How do you judge this?