Stumpy 2.0
Stumpy 2.0
A while ago I got my hands on about 600 extra small ebauchons, all precut to become straight pipes.
A few weeks ago, I decided to tackle on of them just to see what would become of it. The result was Stumpy 1.0, a square-shanked nosewarmer, smaller than a Big Ben pipo:
The grain was worthless, the staining and finish even worse.But my fellow smokers at the dutch pipesmokers forum seemed to rather enjoy it's funny size and shape, and one of them decided to order a stumpy for himself.
This is Stumpy 2.0, basicly the first pipe I've ever sold:
It's not completely done yet, but I'm a bit stuck on how to solve some of the problems, so I was hoping for some tips from the experienced makers here.
The main problem I want to solve is the connection between shank and stem, which has a considerable gap.
I don't have lathe to perfectly square everything, and the "sandpaper with a hole in it"-trick always seems to end up with rounded corners on the edges. The main cause for this gap by the way is the fact angle of the hole in which I inserted the delrin tenon is a few degrees off which left a tiny gap, which got worse when polishing...
The second "problem" I'm going to solve is the thickness of the mouthpiece, which I'm going to refine after I solve problem 1.
And yes, there's also a sort of wave in the shank/stem line, but I'm going to leave that as is, because there's not enough material left to even this out.
A few weeks ago, I decided to tackle on of them just to see what would become of it. The result was Stumpy 1.0, a square-shanked nosewarmer, smaller than a Big Ben pipo:
The grain was worthless, the staining and finish even worse.But my fellow smokers at the dutch pipesmokers forum seemed to rather enjoy it's funny size and shape, and one of them decided to order a stumpy for himself.
This is Stumpy 2.0, basicly the first pipe I've ever sold:
It's not completely done yet, but I'm a bit stuck on how to solve some of the problems, so I was hoping for some tips from the experienced makers here.
The main problem I want to solve is the connection between shank and stem, which has a considerable gap.
I don't have lathe to perfectly square everything, and the "sandpaper with a hole in it"-trick always seems to end up with rounded corners on the edges. The main cause for this gap by the way is the fact angle of the hole in which I inserted the delrin tenon is a few degrees off which left a tiny gap, which got worse when polishing...
The second "problem" I'm going to solve is the thickness of the mouthpiece, which I'm going to refine after I solve problem 1.
And yes, there's also a sort of wave in the shank/stem line, but I'm going to leave that as is, because there's not enough material left to even this out.
Website: http://www.massispipes.com
Instagram : http://instagram.com/massispipes
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MassisPipes
Facebook: https://facebook.com/MassisPipes
Instagram : http://instagram.com/massispipes
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MassisPipes
Facebook: https://facebook.com/MassisPipes
Re: Stumpy 2.0
Rub a pencil on the should of the stem, the part that hits the end of the shank. Insert the stem and it will mark the shank where it touches. Take a small file and remove the mark. Repeat until the whole thing touches at once.
ALL YOUR PIPE ARE BELONG TO US!
Re: Stumpy 2.0
I'm not a experienced pipemaker (in any way), but it will work better if you stick the sandpaper on a thin piece of cardboard.Massis wrote:...the "sandpaper with a hole in it"-trick always seems to end up with rounded corners on the edges.
Or what Sas said,....maybe that works
Greetings,
Ramón
_______________________________________________________
There are two things you need to reach happiness and peace: a swiss knife and masking tape
Ramón
_______________________________________________________
There are two things you need to reach happiness and peace: a swiss knife and masking tape
Re: Stumpy 2.0
I use a half round jeweler's file... it's a pain getting that face flat with hand tools. Well it's always a pain for me at least, but I'm a chump hobbyist so I got nothing but time.Sasquatch wrote:Rub a pencil on the should of the stem, the part that hits the end of the shank. Insert the stem and it will mark the shank where it touches. Take a small file and remove the mark. Repeat until the whole thing touches at once.
Hello, I'm #1312.
That's a really big number.
That's a really big number.
- staffwalker
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: USA, texas
Re: Stumpy 2.0
Take something like a plastic credit card but flat with no numbers imprinted. I steal the motel key cards which never have numbers, cut a peice of sandpaper to fit and super glue the sandpaper to the card. Drill a hole in the center, use this to turn the gap. Try not to flex the card as you turn. I use one finger as if I were turning the propeller on a model airplane. This will do away with the rounded corners. bob gilbertMassis wrote:The main problem I want to solve is the connection between shank and stem, which has a considerable gap.
I don't have lathe to perfectly square everything, and the "sandpaper with a hole in it"-trick always seems to end up with rounded corners on the edges.
Re: Stumpy 2.0
Now there's a hint worth trying!
Sas, I've tried yours and it's much better now, but still not to my liking. Tonight I'm trying the credit card!
Sas, I've tried yours and it's much better now, but still not to my liking. Tonight I'm trying the credit card!
Website: http://www.massispipes.com
Instagram : http://instagram.com/massispipes
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MassisPipes
Facebook: https://facebook.com/MassisPipes
Instagram : http://instagram.com/massispipes
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MassisPipes
Facebook: https://facebook.com/MassisPipes
Re: Stumpy 2.0
For me, the nozzle lip is too thick.
Best regards.
Félix
Para mí, el labio de la boquilla es demasiado grueso.
Saludos.
Félix
Best regards.
Félix
Para mí, el labio de la boquilla es demasiado grueso.
Saludos.
Félix
El mundo de la pipa
http://pipasmasso.blogspot.com.es/
http://pipasmasso.blogspot.com.es/
Re: Stumpy 2.0
What exactly do you mean with the nozzle lip Félix? Do you mean the thickness of the bit compared to the stem? Or just the stem itself?
Anyways: I agree, that's why I've sanded it down some more yesterday. It still looks thick to the eye now, because it doesn't get narrow towards the edges. But the thickest part isn't any thicker than my only Winslow, which has the most comfortable mouthpiece of all my pipes.
Anyways: I agree, that's why I've sanded it down some more yesterday. It still looks thick to the eye now, because it doesn't get narrow towards the edges. But the thickest part isn't any thicker than my only Winslow, which has the most comfortable mouthpiece of all my pipes.
Website: http://www.massispipes.com
Instagram : http://instagram.com/massispipes
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MassisPipes
Facebook: https://facebook.com/MassisPipes
Instagram : http://instagram.com/massispipes
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MassisPipes
Facebook: https://facebook.com/MassisPipes
Re: Stumpy 2.0
The above area is usually about 4 mm for comfortable viewing.
Best regards.
Félix
La zona señalada suele tener unos 4 mm para que resulte cómoda.
Saludos.
Félix
Best regards.
Félix
La zona señalada suele tener unos 4 mm para que resulte cómoda.
Saludos.
Félix
Massis wrote:What exactly do you mean with the nozzle lip Félix? Do you mean the thickness of the bit compared to the stem? Or just the stem itself?
Anyways: I agree, that's why I've sanded it down some more yesterday. It still looks thick to the eye now, because it doesn't get narrow towards the edges. But the thickest part isn't any thicker than my only Winslow, which has the most comfortable mouthpiece of all my pipes.
El mundo de la pipa
http://pipasmasso.blogspot.com.es/
http://pipasmasso.blogspot.com.es/
Re: Stumpy 2.0
Well Félix, I think you underestimate just how small these pipes are
For your information: These pipes weigh about 22-24grammes each, and the longest one is still under 9cm. The bit on the top one measures 3mm, on the lower one it's 4mm. So like I said: they look really thick because they don't get narrower to the side like a normal oval bit, but in fact they're quite comfortable.
I've added the dimensions to the picture for info:
For your information: These pipes weigh about 22-24grammes each, and the longest one is still under 9cm. The bit on the top one measures 3mm, on the lower one it's 4mm. So like I said: they look really thick because they don't get narrower to the side like a normal oval bit, but in fact they're quite comfortable.
I've added the dimensions to the picture for info:
Website: http://www.massispipes.com
Instagram : http://instagram.com/massispipes
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MassisPipes
Facebook: https://facebook.com/MassisPipes
Instagram : http://instagram.com/massispipes
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MassisPipes
Facebook: https://facebook.com/MassisPipes
Re: Stumpy 2.0
Now I understand.
Thank you.
Best regards.
Felix
Ahora lo entiendo.
Gracias.
Best regards.
Félix
Thank you.
Best regards.
Felix
Ahora lo entiendo.
Gracias.
Best regards.
Félix
Massis wrote:Well Félix, I think you underestimate just how small these pipes are
For your information: These pipes weigh about 22-24grammes each, and the longest one is still under 9cm. The bit on the top one measures 3mm, on the lower one it's 4mm. So like I said: they look really thick because they don't get narrower to the side like a normal oval bit, but in fact they're quite comfortable.
I've added the dimensions to the picture for info:
El mundo de la pipa
http://pipasmasso.blogspot.com.es/
http://pipasmasso.blogspot.com.es/