bull dog (well, maybe)

Want to show you work to the world? Want a place to post photos of your work and solicit the opinions of those that have gone before you? Post your work here.
Post Reply
Christopher Brunton
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

bull dog (well, maybe)

Post by Christopher Brunton »

Well, I'm working on a cheesy little post about some design woes (actually changes I had to make during progress due to pits) I have with this pipe.

That's not ready yet, but these pictures are. So here goes......

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
pipeyeti
Posts: 72
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by pipeyeti »

Very cool, I like it. The stem shank junction is very unusual. A very different take on a rhodesian/bulldog.
Last edited by pipeyeti on Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tritrek
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:38 am
Location: Samorin, Slovakia

Post by tritrek »

Wowaweewah! This one rocks! I'd call it a squat bulldog...
User avatar
kbadkar
Site Supporter
Posts: 786
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by kbadkar »

Sweet. I too like the stem/shank junction concoction... very original and elegant.
Charl
Posts: 1902
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:03 pm
Location: South Africa

Post by Charl »

Nice one!
User avatar
Sasquatch
Posts: 5147
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:46 am

Post by Sasquatch »

That's really cool. Shape and grain working very very well.
User avatar
RadDavis
Posts: 2693
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: united states/Alabama
Contact:

Post by RadDavis »

Nicely done, Chris!

I like that pipe a lot. Very cool.

Rad
User avatar
Olivier
Posts: 103
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:41 am
Location: South Africa

Post by Olivier »

Supercool, I like it lots.
Christopher Brunton
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

Post by Christopher Brunton »

Thanks Guys, for the kind words. Overall, I'm pretty happy with it.
I do have a couple of things I wanted to say about it that I thought might be helpful, but I need to scan a couple of drawings and such. I'm just having a little lunch break now (1 o'clock west cost time) but I'll get it done this evening.

The jist of it is that, since I had to "lower" the pipe in the block after I drilled it, the air hole is too high to fit the original design. In profile, the shank should actually taper almost as much as it does as seen from the top.
(Don't worry, that wouldn't make any sense to me either if I hadn't just typed it.) Illustrations forthcoming.........

Thanks again,
chris
pennsyscot
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:03 pm
Location: pennsylvania USA

Post by pennsyscot »

Sweet
User avatar
android
Posts: 150
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:13 am
Location: Ames, Iowa

Post by android »

nothing cheesy about this. it's a fine looking shape, very original. nice work.
User avatar
Sasquatch
Posts: 5147
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:46 am

Post by Sasquatch »

I understand what you are saying, Chris, and I guess this is why lots of guys do a large amount of shaping before they drill. You find those nasty pits or whatever, and work around them, and then you can drill where you need, and the shape doesn't suffer, right?

As it is, you still have a very unique pipe in many ways, and while that little piece of design misery bugs you, it isn't likely to be noticed by the majority of people who look at your pipe. I mean, this is a really fussy lot, around here, and no one said much of anything about that, for instance!

I am curious about how you did that transition between stem and stummel. I asssume that the stem was round off the lathe, and you filed it into final shape with it "plugged in"?
Christopher Brunton
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Sacramento, CA

Post by Christopher Brunton »

Well, for reasons way too boring to get into (involving the twirling beachball of death, for you Mac users) I can only get this drawing posted now.

It does give an idea, I hope, of what I mean about the taper in profile. It's not a big deal, really, since I'm pretty open to changing ideas and perspectives. (Hence, the nickname loosewatches I use on other forums)

I drill, (again, for reasons too boring..) on a milling table I made for my pocket sized mini lathe. It's not great, but it works. That lathe is so incredibly tiny, that I can't really drill by hand with the tailstock. I don't have the skills now to do it any other way. I have a wood lathe but I'm still lacking funds to finish making my jaws for it.

You're right, though, sasquatch, that would be the way to it.

I drilled it on my little milling table and then shaped on a disk sander. The only thing I did on the lathe as far as shaping was clean up the outer circumference of the bowl, (The place where the rings would be if I didn't chicken out.....) and clean up my sloppy rim shaping with 150 grit. I did this by making a wooden taper to fit in the headstock, and turning the business end to fit the tobacco hole like a pin gauge. I guess pictures would help, here, too.

It's nearly impossible to turn anything bigger than a key chain sized pipe without destroying it on a mini lathe. (OK this pipe fit on there. Without the stem it's 3 and 3/4 inches.) I have to turn my compound slide 90 degrees and use that, and though it works, I wouldn't recommend it. Nerves of steel (which don't have) are needed.

I decided that since I couldn't get the "pinched" effect I was looking for in the profile, I'd pinch the whole shank in side to side. Actually, and I know isn't exactly logical, it seems to me to be wearing bell bottoms. (Flared trousers for you Brits.) Logically, were it more pinched in profile it should look More flared, but. O well.

Too much coffee this morning, I do think. And I'm off to a birthday party full of family and five-year-olds. Yay!

(And I still haven't even mentioned what that "moving of the shape" did to the ass end of the pipe. More on this later ......if I can get my pikturz up)



Image
User avatar
Sasquatch
Posts: 5147
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:46 am

Post by Sasquatch »

I think I like your actual "field result" better than your drawing.
Paddington
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:09 am

Post by Paddington »

Sasquatch wrote:I think I like your actual "field result" better than your drawing.
I agree, smoking a drawing would be difficult. :P
wdteipen
Posts: 2819
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 1:05 pm

Post by wdteipen »

Wow! That's a beautiful pipe. I love how the shank pinches real narrow on the underside. Very cool.
Wayne Teipen
Teipen Handmade Briar Pipes
http://www.teipenpipes.com
Post Reply