Pipe Weight

For the things that don't fit neatly into the other categories.
User avatar
bvartist
Posts: 463
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States /Missouri
Contact:

Post by bvartist »

Tyler wrote: Great! I caught about half a dozen bass on it this weekend. It was its maiden voyage. I also caught my first fish (a bluegill) with a fly I tied!

Great fun!

:thumb:
There's nothing like the feeling of catching fish on your own handmade tackle is there? Wonderful!

David
User avatar
marks
Posts: 735
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States/North Carolina

Post by marks »

Funny thing all this talk about weight, and stuff. Smoking pipes dot com just posted a new Tokutomi Cavalier Blowfish that weighs...drum roll please....

5.92 ounces 8O

And gosh is it nice.

And gosh is it expensive.

And gosh is it nice.
User avatar
ArtGuy
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States/Indiana
Contact:

Post by ArtGuy »

I got to see a few of those up close and personal at the last chicago show and boy howdy are those impressive.

I think it is important to point out that not all pipes are meant to be clenchers and held in the mouth. It is perfectly acceptable for a pipe to be larger with the intent of sitting and smoking it (as long as the lines and proportions are such that is does not become bulky or clumsy). Weight is a preference really and not a measure of quality per se.

That being said, I think weight can be an indicator of how well one is able to get the most done with the least waste. One thing I learned going to my first Chicago show is just how small the high grade handmades were.
User avatar
Tyler
Site Supporter
Posts: 2376
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: Farmersville, TX
Contact:

Post by Tyler »

That pipe illustrates what I am saying when I say it needs to weigh as little as possible for THAT pipe. I said earlier that that migh be 4 oz or 0.75 oz. Some pipes are bulkier by design and some are just bulky. Less weight is not somehow superior, but removing unnessary weight IS superior, IMO.

Tyler
User avatar
RadDavis
Posts: 2693
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: united states/Alabama
Contact:

Post by RadDavis »

Well said. John and Tyler!

IMO, a pipe maker should not aim for weight. It's all about style and shape. Cut it to the bone, and let the weight fall where it may.

And Mr. Tokutomi has style coming out the wazoo! :D

Rad
alexanderfrese
Posts: 317
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: Bochum, Germany
Contact:

Post by alexanderfrese »

Though weight is not a primary aim of a pipe making process, i still have that "form follows function" in the back of my mind. Form is not only shape here, but the overall design has to (at least) contribute to the practical usability (i.e. smokeability). And weight comes into matter at some level.
Another principle of designing a shape (take away everything that doesn't look like a pipe) mostly will lead to pipes that are not overweighted. So there is some sort of automatic balancing within that process.
Alexander Frese
www.quarum.de
User avatar
ArtGuy
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States/Indiana
Contact:

Post by ArtGuy »

Agreed
User avatar
bvartist
Posts: 463
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States /Missouri
Contact:

Post by bvartist »

I think a lot of less experienced pipe makers tend to have trouble knowing how much wood they can remove. Especially from the bottom 1/3 or 1/2 of the bowl where its not easy to know how much is there. I know this is the case for me. I've made a couple I thought were too thin toward the bottom of the bowl, yet the measurements showed plenty of wood left. But still that thought of ruining one by going too far is always there. Time and practice will change that I hope!

David
Post Reply