The Chuck Puck

For the things that don't fit neatly into the other categories.
Post Reply
User avatar
ArtGuy
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States/Indiana
Contact:

The Chuck Puck

Post by ArtGuy »

this thing looks like it would be pretty cool for those of us using wood lathes and onway chucks...

http://www.bealltool.com/products/turning/chuckpuck.php
User avatar
bscofield
Posts: 1641
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States/Illinois
Contact:

Post by bscofield »

I know I'm not the only person thinking this, just the only one who will post it...


I don't get it.
User avatar
bvartist
Posts: 463
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States /Missouri
Contact:

Post by bvartist »

bscofield wrote:I know I'm not the only person thinking this, just the only one who will post it...


I don't get it.
Ben, you're mean! :twisted:

I get it, but don't see how it would be that useful for me. I just change to the #1 jaws to hold square stock. Since I'd have to add the two #2 jaws I don't use to the chuck anyway, it would be just as easy to change to the #1 for any turning with square stock.
User avatar
Frank
Posts: 1341
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: Southern California

Post by Frank »

I think Beal Tool mean that it would be primarily useful in a 3-jaw chuck. They just happened to show it in a 4-jaw. Mind you, since it's non-marring, I guess it could be useful in a 4-jaw as well.

It's obviously only useful for 3/4" or 1" square stock.

It looks like one of those gizmos you buy, use once or twice, then they end up gathering dust on the back of your lathe accessories shelf. I think I have a couple of items like that. Hard to tell what's covered in all that dust back there.
Regards,
Frank.
------------------
Grouch Happens!
People usually get the gods they deserve - Terry Pratchett
User avatar
ArtGuy
Posts: 844
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States/Indiana
Contact:

Post by ArtGuy »

If you are using #2 profile or tower jaws you would simply insert this into your jaws and hold a pen blank in there without having to change jaws or put the blank between centers. It basically makes your oneway 4 jaw chuck (which is designed to hold round stock) able to hold small diameter square stock without changing jaws. It would make it easier to do stem inlays without having a metal lathe. I figured it would be a cool little jig for those using only the jet lathe to make pipes.

It's intended for pen makers but I would see it being useful for anyone using pen blanks to make pipes or tampers.
User avatar
JHowell
Posts: 764
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Contact:

Post by JHowell »

I'm with Ben. If you have a 4-jaw scroll chuck like the Oneway, you can hold square stock, just tighten the chuck on it. If the jaws won't close far enough, you can put wooden pads on the jaws, stick with carpet tape. Putting a 4-sided "chuck puck" in a 3-jaw would, I think, yield very erratic results.

Jack
User avatar
KurtHuhn
Site Admin
Posts: 5326
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States/Rhode Island

Post by KurtHuhn »

I actually went one step further and bought a second Oneway body so that all I have to do is swap the chucks. Screwing and unscrewing jaws onto a single chuck is a major PITA.

The thing that concerns me a little about the chuck puck (keeping in mind I've never seen the thing in person) is that pen blanks are rarely delivered as 3/4" or 1". I've gone through a *lot* of these things for pens, tampers, etc, and I don't think I've ever actually seen on that's even square. I'd be afraid that they would rattle around in the chuck puck, especially if unsupported by a tailstock. At least using #1 spigot jaws, you can get two sides really gripping the piece. But maybe the chuck puck is flexible enough to crank down onto the piece - I don't know. I'd have to actually use on in order to make any real judgment.
Kurt Huhn
AKA: Oversized Ostrogoth
artisan@k-huhn.com
User avatar
bscofield
Posts: 1641
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: United States/Illinois
Contact:

Post by bscofield »

bvartist wrote: Ben, you're mean! :twisted:
Hey.... that was meant to be a slam on myself for not getting it, not on John for posting :p

John's follow-up posting makes sense tho. I have a very narrow mind. When he posted it, I put it in MY context which is a 2-tower-jaw setup. That didn't make sense... but when the idea is narrowing the capacity of a larger 4 jaw setup (and making it easier to hold square stock), that make sense...
magruder
Posts: 418
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 8:00 pm
Location: Norfolk
Contact:

Post by magruder »

Looks like a cool time saver.

Kurt, I would think it would have to tighten down to grip the uneven
blanks, otherwise it would be, as you point out, pretty much useless.

Steve Morrisette
Post Reply